State v. Strange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “Where the trial court denies a motion for new trial after conducting an evidentiary hearing, we defer to the court’s findings of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2024-01-31· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hedger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-02-10· cited 676×
• State v. Zichko
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-07-29· cited 472×
• Ratliff v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-07-28· cited 108×
• State v. Olin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-07-09· cited 90×
• State v. Chestnut
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1982-07-20· cited 43×
• Chubb v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 41×
• State v. Cantu
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-01-22· cited 30×
• State v. Gomez
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-07-11· cited 30×
• State v. Seiber
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-03-14· cited 19×
• State v. Reutzel
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-03-10· cited 13×
• Durham v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-01-12· cited 9×
• State v. Bolen
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-10-17· cited 6×