State v. Strange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel’s decision not to object was a legitimate trial tactic even if a witness’s statements were irrelevant or improper opinion testimony
• “Under the Washington and United States Constitutions, a criminal defendant is entitled to a unanimous jury verdict rendered by an impartial jury.”
• discussed in Strange, 188 Wn. App. at 685-87

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vazquez
  Washington Supreme Court· 2021-09-09· cited 36×
• State v. Strange
  Washington Supreme Court· 2015-11-04
• State v. Strange
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-23

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Irvin v. Dowd
  Supreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
• State v. McFarland
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
• State v. Pirtle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
• State v. Petrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
• State v. Lord
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
• State v. Momah
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 239×
• State v. Bobenhouse
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-09-03· cited 99×
• William MACH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-02-11· cited 95×
• State v. Kolesnik
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-09-16· cited 90×
• State v. Siers
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-04-19· cited 74×
• State v. Vander Houwen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 29×
• State v. Beasley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-08· cited 27×
• State v. Beasley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-05· cited 23×