Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/18/2019

State v. Stovall

Citations

2019 Ohio 4287

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in denying Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal the judgment was not against manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court did err in not imposing restitution in open court and in not considering present or future ability to pay costs. Judgment affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Velesquez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 15×
State v. Gessel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-07· cited 11×
State v. Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31· cited 10×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-24· cited 8×
State v. Jordan
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-05· cited 5×
State v. Sanders
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-25· cited 1×
State v. Sutton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-31· cited 1×
State v. Richardson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
State v. Prescott
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-10· cited 44×
State v. Wymer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-26· cited 26×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.