Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/20/2007
State v. Stone
Citations
- 655 S.E.2d 487
- 376 S.C. 32
- 2007 S.C. LEXIS 423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing an appellant's argument on appeal was not preserved for review when the appellant did not argue those grounds in support of his argument before the circuit court
- “South Carolina’s strict error preservation rules are no less applicable in death penalty cases”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-10-13· cited 513×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 83×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 39×
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-07-15· cited 28×
- State v. SappSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-10-24· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.