Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/14/2016
State v. Stokes
Citations
- 492 S.W.3d 622
- 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 603
- 2016 WL 3269763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A statement may be admitted as the admission of a party opponent if it is relevant and material to the case and is offered by the opposing party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd, III, Mooney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 259×
- State v. IsaSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-03-23· cited 203×
- State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri· 1965-03-08· cited 141×
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-01-30· cited 105×
- Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 101×
- State of Missouri v. Justin Floyd Eugene JonesSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-01-26· cited 46×
- State v. FloydMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-16· cited 40×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1981-01-13· cited 35×
- State v. MolaskyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-06-14· cited 31×
- State v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-09-18· cited 21×
- State v. DaviesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-12-14· cited 21×
- State v. WebberMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-12-30· cited 21×
- State v. MinerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-01-24· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-07-08· cited 5×
- State v. BuseyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-10-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.