State v. Stith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is true that the identity of the controlled substance is an essential element of the crime of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell or deliver.” (emphasis in the original (citation omitted))
• “It is true that the identity of the controlled substance is an essential element of the crime of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell or deliver.” (emphasis in the original (citation omitted))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07· cited 1×
• In re: J.S.G.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-03-02
• State v. Hills
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-06
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stokes
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1968-10-30· cited 32×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-07-21· cited 15×
• State v. Benedict
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-11-10· cited 10×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-07-07· cited 5×
• Graham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-08-08· cited 4×