State v. Stills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting state’s concession that, “on the unique facts of this case,” the defendant’s refusal to perform FSTs was not admissible evidence of his guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-01-24· cited 10×
• State v. Shevyakov
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05· cited 8×