State v. Stewart

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 3279

Syllabus

Although appellant agreed to forfeit property pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court did not order the forfeiture of appellant's property. Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law the sentence fell within the range provided by statute, and the trial court stated in its judgment entry that it had considered the principles and purposes of sentencing set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12. The trial court erred in failing to calculate and notify appellant of his jail-time credit. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.