State v. Stewart

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1673

Syllabus

Felony plea agreement guilty plea plea colloquy recess Crim.R. 11 compliance Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) rights nature of the charges penalties postrelease control advisement prejudice. Affirmed the judgment of conviction entered upon appellant's plea of guilty to five felony offenses pursuant to a plea agreement. The record demonstrated that the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) and that the appellant was fully informed of his constitutional rights. A lunch recess did not require the trial court to start over and readvise the appellant of his rights. The record also demonstrated the appellant's understanding of the nature of the charges and of the maximum penalties involved. Even if it was improper to provide an advisement on postrelease control, appellant failed to demonstrate any prejudice.