Court of Appeals of Georgia· 4/7/1992
State v. Stewart
Citations
- 418 S.E.2d 110
- 203 Ga. App. 829
- 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 274
- 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- police could not have a reasonable belief of authority to consent in a person who rented a warehouse for a friend but did not have a key or other means of access
- agents could not reasonably believe that person giving consent possessed any authority over the premises when he informed the agents that he had no key or other means of access and the agents had to cut the padlock to gain entry
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sognier, McMurray, Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-07-12· cited 18×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-05-21· cited 17×
- State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-03-19· cited 15×
- State v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-09· cited 11×
- State v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-16· cited 7×
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-11-17· cited 6×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-08-13· cited 5×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-05-27· cited 10×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-05-16· cited 5×
- Moses v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-02-01· cited 2×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-10-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.