State v. Stessman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there is no right of a direct appeal from a deferred judgment because a final judgment in the district court does not exist
• holding a deferred judgment is not a “final judgment of sentence” from which a defendant may appeal under Iowa Code section 814.6
• holding a deferred judgment is interlocutory and cannot meet the final judgment requirement for appeals
• holding there is no right of a direct appeal from a deferred judgment because a final judgment in the district court does not exist
• finding that General Motors was a victim when agent car dealership performed repairs on defendant’s vehicle, and General Motors reimbursed the dealership due to defendant’s deception concerning the odometer reading
• concluding a criminal defendant who requested a deferred judgment consented to a deferred judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).