Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/19/1997
State v. Stephenson
Citations
- 948 P.2d 1321
- 89 Wash. App. 217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing RCW 9A.56.020 and former RCW 9A.56.010(7) as proscribing four alternative means of theft: (1) by taking; (2) by embezzlement; (3) by color or aid of deception; and (4) appropriating lost or misdelivered property or services
- describing RCW 9A.56.020 and former RCW 9A.56.010(7) as proscribing four alternative means of theft: (1) by taking; (2) by embezzlement; (3) by color or aid of deception; and (4) appropriating lost or misdelivered property or services
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
- State v. Ortega-MartinezWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 224×
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 165×
- State v. JoyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-29· cited 164×
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-09· cited 48×
- State v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-11· cited 21×
- State v. SouthardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-17· cited 15×
- State v. DaultCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-03-13· cited 11×
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-06-13· cited 9×
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-11-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.