Skip to main content
· 12/22/2022

State v. Stennett

Citations

  • 204 N.E.3d 691
  • 2022 Ohio 4645

Syllabus

Sexual battery sentence review R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 R.C. 2953.08 sex offender registration requirements plea colloquy Crim.R. 11. Affirmed. There is no reversible error in this appeal because there is no practical difference between a 48-month prison sentence and the four-year term imposed the defendant's sentence cannot be reviewed to determine whether the record supports the sentencing factors or considerations under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 and the trial court's advisement with respect to the sex offender registration requirements was sufficient under Crim.R. 11.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.