Skip to main content
· 4/15/1891

State v. Steifel

Citations

  • 106 Mo. 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the defendant’s interest in timely addressing the substance of a lawsuit alone is insufficient to support a finding of prejudice for purposes of the defense of laches
  • reversing trial court’s finding that action was barred by laches because there was insufficient evidence to support finding of prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.