Indiana Supreme Court· 7/10/1968
State v. Stefaniak
Citations
- 238 N.E.2d 451
- 250 Ind. 631
- 1968 Ind. LEXIS 698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is our opinion that the question of a compensable taking is a matter for the jury’s determination. Each case of this nature must be grounded upon its own particular set of facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, Lewis, Arterburn, Jackson, Mote
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Kimco of Evansville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-03-04· cited 26×
- Board of Com'rs of Vanderburgh Cty. v. JoeckelIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-07-15· cited 25×
- CITY OF GARY, ETC. v. RubertoIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-09-22· cited 18×
- Schuh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1968-11-08· cited 17×
- Taylor-Chalmers, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 16×
- Jenkins v. Board of County CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-09-15· cited 13×
- Tomkins v. Village of Tinley ParkN.D. Illinois· 1983-04-26· cited 11×
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Whitley County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1974-06-19· cited 10×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-01-31· cited 7×
- Beck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1971-04-22· cited 7×
- State v. Kimco of Evansville, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-31· cited 4×
- Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-30· cited 3×
- Indiana & Mich. Elec. Co. v. WHITLEY CTY. REMIndiana Court of Appeals· 1974-06-19· cited 1×
- Jenkins v. Madison Co. Bd. of Comm.Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-09-15
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ENSLEYIndiana Supreme Court· 1960-02-08· cited 67×
- State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. SPIDEL ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court· 1964-12-15· cited 46×
- State v. JORDANIndiana Supreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 27×
- Papp v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court· 1967-10-19· cited 24×
- State v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court· 1894-11-20· cited 17×
- Cleveland, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court· 1923-03-07· cited 7×
- Barnett v. Bailey's Beautician Supply Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1966-10-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.