State v. Steensland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the trial court should have removed a prospective juror who equivocated when asked if he had formed a fixed opinion about the accused’s guilt
• “some unseen pressure on the mind, drawing it to consequences which it sees, but cannot avoid, and placing it under a coercion which, while its results are clearly perceived, it is incapable of resisting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).