State v. Starnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A defendant is not entitled to a reduction in his sentence merely because a co-defendant or accomplice has . . . received a lesser sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Delk
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-05-04· cited 57×
• State v. Goodroad
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 26×
• State v. Denison
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-04· cited 16×
• State v. Evenson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-09-24· cited 9×
• State v. Krebsbach
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-11-15· cited 2×
• State v. Witucki
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-02-23· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Billstrom
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×
• State v. Turnipseed
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-12· cited 104×
• State v. Doughman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-04· cited 52×
• State v. Strimling
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-03-10· cited 52×
• State v. Vazquez
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-18· cited 33×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-12· cited 27×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-07-01· cited 18×
• State v. Lynard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-17· cited 12×
• State v. DeGidio
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-01-06· cited 5×
• Spears v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-12-19· cited 5×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-22· cited 1×