Skip to main content

State v. Starks

Citations

  • 997 A.2d 546
  • 121 Conn. App. 581
  • 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review unpreserved claim of illegal sentence under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 [1989] or plain error doctrine
  • declining to review unpreserved claim of illegal sentence under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 [1989], or plain error doctrine embodied in Practice Book § 60-5
  • declining to review unpreserved claim of illegal sentence under State v. Golding , 213 Conn. 233 , 239-40, 567 A.2d 823 [1989], or plain error doctrine embodied in Practice Book § 60-5
  • trial court incorrectly exercised jurisdiction in denying portion of motion to correct
  • trial court incorrectly exercised jurisdiction in denying portion of motion to correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, DiPentima, Harper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.