Skip to main content

State v. Starks

Citations

  • 596 P.2d 366
  • 122 Ariz. 531
  • 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, under former duress statute, that psychiatric testimony \delved into the defendant's subjective mental state and was therefore properly excluded\
  • holding no error by trial court in not precluding evidence as unfairly prejudicial where evidence went directly to central issue
  • defendant committed armed robbery while effecting an escape during a pretrial hearing and shackling defendant was not error
  • defendant committed armed robbery while effecting an escape during a pretrial hearing and shackling defendant was not error
  • “[T]he court has broad discretion to determine the nature of any sanction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.