State v. Stanton
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4087
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress. The officers saw a car that had fled from them a few days earlier parked at a store while parked, the car's engine was running, but it was unoccupied. The car had dark tinted windows and was playing music loudly. The officers reasonably believed that appellant was the driver of the vehicle when he exited the store, walked to the driver's door, and stopped. The officers reasonably stopped and detained appellant to investigate possible criminal violations connected with the car. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. BatchiliOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 209×
- State v. Hairston (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-05-02· cited 69×
- State v. BelvinOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.