State v. Stanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the record failed to establish that a defendant had made an intentional and knowing waiver of his right to counsel and the court could not determine what the outcome of the case would have been had the defendant been represented, remand for a new trial was appropriate
• where the court could not determine what the outcome of the case would have been had the defendant been represented, remand was appropriate
• “Essentially, the court put [the] defendant in the position of choosing between being represented by court-appointed counsel with an unresolved conflict claim and representing himself. That was impermissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hernandez-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-09· cited 7×
• State v. Roberts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2026-02-05· cited 5×
• Dept. of Human Services v. E. L. P.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-12-11· cited 4×
• State v. Autele
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-06-13· cited 3×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-30
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22
• City of Eugene v. Hejazi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-13

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Meyrick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 136×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 134×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 86×
• State v. Hightower
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-04-27· cited 56×
• State v. Davidson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-03-12· cited 45×
• State v. Cole
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-03-21· cited 43×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-11-18· cited 41×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-03-29· cited 30×
• State v. Krause
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-25· cited 24×
• State v. Crain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 4×