State v. Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to convict the defendant of receiving stolen property, the State did not have to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the specific identity of the owner of the property; rather, the State had to prove only that the property was “‘the property of another’” (quotation omitted)
• to convict the defendant of receiving stolen property, the State did not have to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the specific identity of the owner of the property; rather, the State had to prove only that the property was \ 'the property of another' \ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wong
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-12-17· cited 28×
• State v. Felix Ruiz
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2018-01-31· cited 9×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ruelke
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-11-30· cited 52×
• State v. Fennelly
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-06-09· cited 27×
• State v. Therrien
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-09· cited 15×