Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/1/2004
State v. Stanley
Citations
- 85 P.3d 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that because the record does not contain jury deliberations, the State could not meet its burden to show that the failure to provide a required jury instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-25· cited 14×
- State v. ManroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-10· cited 13×
- State v. ChirinosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-16· cited 8×
- State v. BlancaflorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-08-25· cited 3×
- State v. HoltHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-11-21· cited 1×
- State Of Washington, V Othniel Ruiz Blancaflor And Cynthia C. BlancaflorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-08-25
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-12-19· cited 115×
- State v. AshcraftCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-10-11· cited 105×
- State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court· 1963-10-24· cited 82×
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-15· cited 40×
- State v. MickensWashington Supreme Court· 1962-12-20· cited 33×
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-01· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.