Hawaii Supreme Court· 3/22/1979
State v. Stanley
Citations
- 592 P.2d 422
- 60 Haw. 527
- 1979 Haw. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prospective application of the new rule regarding timing of appeals from family court orders waiving jurisdiction benefitted the defendant because this court accepted and reviewed his appeal although he did not appeal the family court's waiver of jurisdiction until after he was convicted
- prospective application of the new rule regarding timing of appeals from family court orders waiving jurisdiction benefitted the defendant because this court accepted and reviewed his appeal although he did not appeal the family court's waiver of jurisdiction until after he was convicted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Well
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CottoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-20· cited 81×
- State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court· 2008-04-04· cited 60×
- People of the Territory of Guam v. William E. KingsburyNinth Circuit· 1981-06-29· cited 30×
- HawaiiUSA Federal Credit Union v. Monalim.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-04-30· cited 24×
- State v. EnglishHawaii Supreme Court· 1979-05-11· cited 24×
- Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1979-12-20· cited 21×
- State v. HowertonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1985-04-18· cited 16×
- State v. EnglishHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-05-11· cited 12×
- In Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1980-05-02· cited 10×
- In Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1979-08-02· cited 7×
- In Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1980-02-25· cited 6×
- In Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1979-12-31· cited 6×
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-10-03· cited 3×
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-10-27· cited 2×
- In Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-09-30
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-12-29· cited 248×
- Harbert v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1975-08-14· cited 81×
- State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-06-28· cited 46×
- State v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-08-21· cited 41×
- A JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-01-31· cited 41×
- Sherfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-06-14· cited 33×
- Lewis v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1970-12-21· cited 32×
- State v. DoyalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-07-05· cited 29×
- Miller v. QuatsoeE.D. Wisconsin· 1971-10-19· cited 26×
- State, in Interest of SalasUtah Supreme Court· 1974-03-29· cited 23×
- State v. HarwoodIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-12-29· cited 22×
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1968-09-26· cited 21×
- In the Interest of DinsonHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 17×
- State v. ScovilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-04-30· cited 16×
- Lujan v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court· 1973-01-24· cited 14×
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1977-08-08· cited 14×
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1968-11-01· cited 9×
- State ex rel. B. T., W. W. & E. S.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-11-16· cited 9×
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court· 1976-12-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.