State v. St. Anthony Church
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 164
Syllabus
Community control; res judicata; Crim.R. 36; Cleveland Cod.Ord. 367.12(a). Judgment affirmed. St. Anthony Church (\SAC\) is a fictitious name and there is no legal distinction between Albert Thrower and SAC. Accordingly, Thrower was a party to the underlying proceedings. SAC's arguments challenging the blanket effect of the housing court's community-control order established in judgments prior to the appealed community-control violation and nunc pro tunc entries are barred by res judicata. Moreover, the housing court's nunc pro tunc entry complied with Crim.R. 36. Finally, the housing court did not err in finding that SAC violated community control for its failure to comply with Cleveland Cod.Ord. 367.12(a), amongst other reasons.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.