Supreme Court of Minnesota· 12/7/1984
State v. Spurgin
Citations
- 358 N.W.2d 648
- 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issue before court was defendant’s desire to bifurcate unitary trial following the prosecution’s presentation of its case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yetka
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-03· cited 44×
- State v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-04-28· cited 22×
- State v. DevineSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 21×
- State v. JackmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-11-14· cited 20×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-08· cited 11×
- State v. Tayari-GarrettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-01-13· cited 9×
- State v. QuastCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-04· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- State v. SwainSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 89×
- State v. OeveringSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 85×
- State v. McCullumSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-09-07· cited 49×
- State v. NeumannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-01-20· cited 45×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-10-31· cited 38×
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-05-01· cited 31×
- State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-06-03· cited 22×
- State v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-12-08· cited 18×
- State v. KivimakiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-03-16· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.