State v. Spruill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• officer not required to consider and eliminate possible explanations for a driver’s apparently impaired condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kappel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-13· cited 15×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-11-14· cited 13×
• State v. Bourget-Goddard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-29· cited 12×
• State v. Stoudamire
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-16· cited 10×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 10×
• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-04· cited 7×
• State v. Vantress
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-01· cited 7×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 7×
• State v. Torres
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-17· cited 5×
• State v. Balabon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-18· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Nagel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 119×
• State v. Paulson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 88×
• State v. Clark
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 63×
• State v. Moylett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 59×
• State v. Gilmour
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 20×
• State v. Chambless
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-22· cited 15×
• Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 9×
• State v. Mendoza
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-22· cited 6×