State v. Spriggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• corroboration of easily obtainable and neutral information does not, standing alone, establish veracity of informant
• informant had used marijuana, had seen marijuana plants before and could identify them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Arana
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 3×
• State v. Kreutzer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-12-20· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moylett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 59×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-07-24· cited 43×
• State v. Alvarez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-06-27· cited 38×
• State v. Prince
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 34×
• State v. Brotherton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-22· cited 9×
• State v. Chezem
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-22· cited 8×
• State v. Brust
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-12-14· cited 7×
• State v. Hoffer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-08-05· cited 5×
• State v. Bice
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-14· cited 5×
• State v. Strance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-17· cited 4×