Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/21/2025
State v. Spradlin
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 135
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in admitting the deputy's testimony and body camera recording where neither the testimony nor recording contained out-of-court statements used to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GrindstaffOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 23×
- State v. NapierOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-23· cited 20×
- State v. SinghOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-26· cited 11×
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-01· cited 8×
- State v. SpradlinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-21· cited 8×
- State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-07-31· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-09· cited 5×
- State v. PiercefieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-30· cited 4×
- State v. LeachOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-19· cited 4×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.