Skip to main content
· 5/8/2000

State v. Spor

Citations

  • 1 P.3d 816
  • 134 Idaho 315
  • 2000 Ida. App. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court properly admitted evidence of prior uncharged misconduct because it was relevant to show the defendant’s “lustful intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartzman, Perry, Lansing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.