Idaho Court of Appeals· 5/8/2000
State v. Spor
Citations
- 1 P.3d 816
- 134 Idaho 315
- 2000 Ida. App. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the district court properly admitted evidence of prior uncharged misconduct because it was relevant to show the defendant’s “lustful intent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartzman, Perry, Lansing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-09-08· cited 3,704×
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-12-10· cited 2,575×
- State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-11-16· cited 736×
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-02-10· cited 676×
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 601×
- State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-03-07· cited 428×
- State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 247×
- State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-08-01· cited 105×
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-10-01· cited 77×
- State v. TolmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-03-31· cited 68×
- State v. CrossIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-04-29· cited 53×
- State v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-01-28· cited 33×
- State v. ByingtonIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-03-12· cited 32×
- State v. LaBelleIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-01-06· cited 18×
- State v. ByingtonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-06-23· cited 15×
- State v. NunesIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-05-04· cited 11×
- State v. DragomanIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-06-05· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.