State v. Spirnak

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 6838

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of prior bad acts because it provided limiting instructions, it did not err in excluding hearsay evidence, and appellant did not demonstrate prejudice from being denied the ability to recross- examine witnesses. The trial court did not err in giving a consciousness of guilty instruction and failing to give lesser included offense instructions. Finally, the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.