State v. Speer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying upon trial court’s jury instruction that out-of-court statements were admitted for sole purpose of rehabilitating victim’s credibility by showing prior consistent statements
• relying upon trial court's jury instruction that out-of-court statements were admitted for sole purpose of rehabilitating victim's credibility by showing prior consistent statements
• upholding the admission of out-of-court statements under rule 801(d)(1)(B) where there had been a direct attempt to impeach testimony as being recently fabricated
• upholding the admission of out-of-court statements under rule 801(d)(1)(B) where there had been a direct attempt to impeach testimony as being recently fabricated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eldredge
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-02-01· cited 147×
• State v. Schreuder
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-08-15· cited 68×
• State v. Thomas
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 41×
• Julian v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-08-04· cited 33×
• State v. Loughton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 20×
• State v. Gardner
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-09-23· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Petree
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-02-04· cited 148×
• State v. Booker
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-10-25· cited 99×
• State v. Lamm
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-01-16· cited 68×
• State v. Asay
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-05-21· cited 12×