State v. Spearin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for further consideration following an appeal taken from the denial of a motion for a new trial \out of concern for basic fairness to defendant and for full development of [an] adequate record[ ] for appellate review\
• remanding for further consideration following an appeal taken from the denial of a motion for a new trial “out of concern for basic fairness to defendant and for full development of [an] adequate record[] for appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Spearin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-05-31· cited 22×
• State v. Gatcomb
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-01· cited 11×
• State v. Walker
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-06-05· cited 3×
• State v. Spearin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-12-11

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Spearin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-07-29· cited 14×
• State v. Lord
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-04-15· cited 13×
• United States v. Anthony Cardarella
  Eighth Circuit· 1978-12-18· cited 11×