· 6/30/1998
State v. Spath
Citations
- 1998 ND 133
- 581 N.W.2d 123
- 1998 N.D. LEXIS 137
- 1998 WL 345178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s confrontation clause claim and noting that although the evidentiary privilege at issue contained some limited exceptions, it did not contain a general exception for disclosure of records pursuant to court order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Maring, Meschke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.