Skip to main content
· 6/30/1998

State v. Spath

Citations

  • 1998 ND 133
  • 581 N.W.2d 123
  • 1998 N.D. LEXIS 137
  • 1998 WL 345178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s confrontation clause claim and noting that although the evidentiary privilege at issue contained some limited exceptions, it did not contain a general exception for disclosure of records pursuant to court order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Maring, Meschke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.