State v. Sparks

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 3145

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for public indecency was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the trial court believed the victim's testimony that appellant exposed his penis to her while they were at work. However, because trial court erred by denying appellant his right to allocution prior to issuing its sentencing decision, the trial court's sentencing decision was reversed and the matter was remanded for the limited purpose of resentencing.