New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2/24/2000
State v. Spano
Citations
- 328 N.J. Super. 287
- 745 A.2d 598
- 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding the exclusion of expert testimony on the meaning of “worrying” in a statute which allowed a person to kill a dog if it was “worrying” a domestic animal and affirming the defendant’s conviction
- upholding the exclusion of expert testimony on the meaning of “worrying” in a statute which allowed a person to kill a dog if it was “worrying” a domestic animal and affirming the defendant’s conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carchman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-04-20· cited 1,662×
- State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-03-02· cited 859×
- Central Columbia School District v. PolkSupreme Court· 1989-01-17· cited 135×
- Shirley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-09-05· cited 12×
- People v. Superior Court (Elder)California Court of Appeal· 1988-06-03· cited 11×
- Trautman v. DayNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-01-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.