Skip to main content
· 2/26/2019

State v. Spanks

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 678

Syllabus

Trial court properly considered indigent defendant's present and future ability to pay before imposing restitution as part of sentence. The amount of restitution ordered was supported by statements from prosecutor, which sufficed because defense counsel did not dispute that house destroyed by arson was a total loss.

Judges: Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.