Skip to main content
· 12/3/1969

State v. Sovich

Citations

  • 252 N.E.2d 582
  • 253 Ind. 224
  • 1969 Ind. LEXIS 306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that neither increase nor decrease in value precipitated by knowl edge of government project is to be considered in valuing property
  • holding that neither increase nor decrease in value precipitated by knowledge of government project is to be considered in valuing property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.