State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that applicant seeking temporary injunction is not required to establish that it will ultimately prevail in litigation
• explaining that a utility enjoying a monopoly is legally obligated to offer its services at reasonable rates and without undue discrimination
• defining status quo as the “last, actual, peaceable, non-contested status that preceded the pending controversy”
• defining status quo as the “last, actual, peaceable, non-contested status that preceded the pending controversy”
• defining status quo as the “last, actual, peaceable, non-contested status that preceded the pending controversy”
• defining status quo as “last, actual, peaceable, non-contested status that preceded the pending controversy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).