State v. Soumare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that personal jurisdiction not “necessary to ensure meaningful review” of class certifi- cation
• concluding that class certification was inappropriate in a civil RICO case 42 Case: 14-20128 Document: 00513700292 Page: 43 Date Filed: 09/30/2016 No. 14-20128 because the various motivations for gambling precluded common issues from predominating over individual ones
• noting that “we took pains to cabin our holding [in Meredith] to the unique facts” of the case
• stating that the second prong is “restrictive” and “requires that the pendent decision have much more than a tangential relationship to the decision properly before us on interlocutory appeal”
• stating that the second prong is “restrictive” and “requires that the pendent decision have much more than a tangential relationship to the decision properly before us on interlocutory appeal”
• declining to review a district court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction because “the district court would have retained jurisdiction .., regardless of whether it asserted personal jurisdiction over [a subgroup of] defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).