State v. Soto-Nunez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to exercise Ailes discretion to consider unpreserved error because, had the matter been brought to the trial court’s attention, “it might easily have been remedied”
• declining to exercise Ailes discretion to address unpreserved claim of error that trial court had erred in failing to make findings required by ORS 137.750 because, if the defendant had timely brought that matter to the trial court's attention, \it might easily have been remedied\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).