Skip to main content

State v. Soto

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4517

Syllabus

Final and Appealable Order; Plea Agreement; Motion to Dismiss Indictment. The trial court's order denying defendant-appellant's motion to enforce his plea agreement and dismiss the criminal case was a final, appealable order. For two independent reasons, the trial court did not err in denying the motion. First, circumstances for applying the principles from Supreme Court of Ohio caselaw on which defendant-appellant's appeal relies are absent from the peculiar facts and scenario presented. Second, defendant-appellant breached the plea agreement, so he is barred from attempting to enforce it against the State to dismiss the current indictment.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.