State v. Soria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Administrative Order pertains only to fees related to a bench warrant
• imposition of warrant fee unauthorized under circumstances created illegal sentence; fee vacated as fundamental error
• imposition of consecutive sentences in violation of AR.S. § 13-116 creates an illegal sentence, which is fundamental error
• imposition of warrant fee unauthorized 10 under circumstances created illegal sentence; fee vacated as fundamental error
• unauthorized warrant fee was illegal sentence and constituted fundamental error
• unauthorized warrant fee was illegal sentence and constituted fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Payne
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-24· cited 40×
• State v. McDonagh
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-07· cited 21×
• State of Arizona v. James A. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-11-19
• State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-24
• State of Arizona v. James Lewandowski
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-31
• State v. Ayonayon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-08-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Henderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
• State v. Munninger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-08· cited 63×
• Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-09· cited 43×
• Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-03-24· cited 32×
• Medley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-01· cited 14×
• Gotay v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 7×