State v. Sorenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the mere presence of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute possession”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Amoroso
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-04· cited 13×
• State v. Barela
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1989-09-07· cited 9×
• State v. Hagen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-11-23· cited 8×
• State v. Ireland
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2005-01-21· cited 6×
• State v. Abu-Shanab
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-12-05· cited 3×
• State v. Becker
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-12-20· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Mullaney v. Wilbur
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
• Francis v. Franklin
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
• County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
• State v. Hornaday
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 96×
• State v. Losolla
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-06-23· cited 40×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-10-07· cited 33×
• State v. Chambers
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-10-21· cited 25×
• State v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1987-05-04· cited 1×