Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/22/2009
State v. Snyder
Citations
- 206 P.3d 1083
- 227 Or. App. 544
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to resolve issue because trial court expressly declined to reach that issue and because the issue may involve disputed issues of fact
- declining to resolve issue because trial court expressly declined to reach that issue and because the issue may involve disputed issues of fact
- rejecting the state’s argument that the defendant failed to preserve his statutory claim of error by noting that he had specifically argued that the state had failed to prove that an emergency existed under Article I, section 9
- appellate court will not resolve disputed factual issues on appeal when it is not exercising de novo review
- appellate court will not resolve disputed factual issues on appeal when it is not exercising de novo review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Riggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.