Skip to main content

State v. Snyder

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 216

Syllabus

The defendant's conviction for violating a protection order is affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a continuance on the day of trial where the trial had previously been continued, and the defendant was able to present copies of documents prepared by the defendant despite them containing handwriting. While each side may have been able to more thoroughly demonstrate their respective positions, the defendant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence simply because trial court believed the testimony and evidence presented by the State.

Judges: M. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.