Skip to main content
· 4/1/1998

State v. Snuggerud

Citations

  • 956 P.2d 1015
  • 153 Or. App. 300
  • 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The officer’s continuous observation of defendant . . . satisfied the rule’s requirement.”
  • “The officer’s continuous observation of defendant ... satisfied the rule’s requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, P.J., Haselton, J., and Rossman, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.