State v. Snow
Citations
- 65 Wash. 353
- 118 P. 209
- 1911 Wash. LEXIS 927
Syllabus
<p>Embezzlement — Larceny—Statutes—Construction. Under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2601, making it larceny for any person to withhold or appropriate property in his possession, “as a public officer, or as a person authorized by agreement or competent authority to hold the same,” a state officer who withholds or misappropriates money of the state in his possession as such officer is guilty of larceny although he had no authority or warrant in law to receive it; the clause as to “competent authority” not applying to “public officers,” and the law having regard to the officer’s relation to the money, and not to the legality of its acquirement.</p>
Judges: Gose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-12-22· cited 78×
- People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court· 1895-09-27· cited 42×
- State v. O'BrienTennessee Supreme Court· 1894-11-10· cited 28×
- Skagit County v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-06-10· cited 20×
- Ex parte RicordNevada Supreme Court· 1876-10-15· cited 18×
- State v. TumeyIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-05-15· cited 18×
- Orton v. City of LincolnIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-06-13· cited 9×
- People v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court· 1905-03-21· cited 7×
- County of San Luis Obispo v. FarnumCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-08-27· cited 6×
- People ex rel. Lane v. HiltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan· 1888-09-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.