State v. Snodgrass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting comparable Arizona statute in light of Fourth Amendment — physical act or exertion against officer required to constitute offense of resisting or obstructing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bruggeman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-28· cited 43×
• State v. Islas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-04-28· cited 27×
• State v. Wilkerson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-30· cited 24×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-08-24· cited 21×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-28· cited 12×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-09-03· cited 9×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-30· cited 8×
• State of Arizona v. Michael Edward Garfield
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-06-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mosley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-27· cited 76×
• State v. Mohr
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-11-25· cited 25×
• State v. Snodgrass
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-09-07· cited 16×
• State v. Colson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-25· cited 9×
• State v. Dziggel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-01-27· cited 6×