Hawaii Supreme Court· 5/14/1986
State v. Sneed
Citations
- 718 P.2d 280
- 68 Haw. 463
- 1986 Haw. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, in the absence of such a rational basis in the evidence, the trial court should not instruct the jury as to included offenses
- propriety of instructing on lesser included defense depends on whether there is a rational basis to acquit of charged offense, but convict of included offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KinnaneHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 86×
- State v. KupauHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-08-22· cited 84×
- State v. KupiheaHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 23×
- State v. NakachiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1987-08-14· cited 16×
- State v. KupauHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1994-02-22· cited 12×
- State v. CoyleHawaii Supreme Court· 1990-01-29· cited 4×
- State v. KAPAUHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-08-22· cited 1×
- State v. Faamama.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2016-11-14· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.